Puppy’s ears chopped off by cruel owner who wanted more money for her

Two women have been banned from keeping dogs after giving their puppy a painful botched ear cropping job, stitched up with fishing line, so she was worth more money. Partners Dawn Hillbeck, 23, and Louise Hillbeck, 25, kept a number of American bully dogs with cropped ears at their home in Roxburghshire, Scotland. Their property was raided by officers at the Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA), after receiving a tip off about the poor treatment.

They found four-month-old Russia, who had severely swollen and infected wounds where her ear flaps used to be.

According to the SPCA, American bully puppies – a cross between an American Staffordshire Terrier and an American Pit Bull Terrier – sell for up to £6,000 each but can be priced even higher if they have cropped ears, a desirable feature for some dog owners. The charity added that it is ‘completely unacceptable’ for criminals to mutilate puppies in such a way and cause ‘unnecessary suffering’ for purely cosmetic reasons. An SPCA special investigations unit inspector said: ‘We received information that the offenders were keeping American bully dogs with cropped ears and that there was a puppy, who we now know as Russia, who had freshly cropped ears. ‘Due to the immediate concern for the dogs in the Hillbecks’ care, we were granted a search warrant. We found three bully puppies on the premises.’ All dogs were taken into SPCA specialist care, though Russia was the only one who had both her ear flaps freshly removed. ‘The ears were very badly swollen and infected,’ the inspector said.

They added that the use of a fishing line to stitch Russia’s wounds up was ‘evidence that a qualified vet wasn’t used to carry out the procedure.’ At Jedburgh Sheriff Court on March 18, Dawn admitted to permitting a prohibited procedure on a protected animal under Section 20 (2) of the Animal Health and Welfare Scotland Act 2006. Louise also pleaded guilty to causing a prohibited procedure. They were each sentenced to carry out 80 hours of unpaid work and given a five year ban on dealing and trading dogs. The couple, who have now moved to England, were also sentenced to a one-year conduct requirement order to complete an RSPCA education programme and will also be subject to random home checks. The SPCA said it would have preferred a tougher sentence and said: ‘While we are pleased the court acknowledges the suffering in this case, we would have supported a ban on the owning and keeping of all animals. ‘We are aware of organised criminals profiteering from this trade and we feel stronger sentencing would act as a deterrent and send out the message that mutilating an animal for superficial and monetary reasons is completely unacceptable.’

 

Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/20/puppys-ears-chopped-off-by-cruel-owner-who-wanted-more-money-for-her-8956157/?ito=cbshare

Twitter: https://twitter.com/MetroUK | Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MetroUK/

 

3 Comments

  1. Christine Boulton 1 month ago

    Cruelty to animals should generally result in a prison sentence. This pair are absolutely vile.

  2. Helen Burton 1 month ago

    Completely agree with the SPCA, disgusting that they only got a 5 year ban , the courts are wasting money and time giving such inappropriate sentences , there is no deterrent in such a sentence , as the money they receive for such cruelty inflicted on these dogs to make them more attractive to certain types far out weighs any realistic deterrent !!

  3. patlucky 1 month ago

    I cannot repeat what I think here.
    So I will just say hope what goes around comes around. (SOON)

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.